In a new peer-reviewed study published in The BMJ Journal of Medical Ethics, researchers performed a risk-benefit assessment and ethical analysis using data from Pfizer, Moderna and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Their findings were:

• Over a six-month period, 31,207 to 42,836 young adults ages 18-29, would have to receive a third mRNA vaccine – a booster – in order to prevent a single hospitalisation.
• For every hospitalisation averted there would be approximately 18.5 serious adverse events (SAE)s and 1430 – 4626 disruptions of daily activities, including in males, 1.5-4.6 booster-associated cases of myopericarditis, typically requiring hospitalisation.

And then there’s this:

• For 32 hospitalisations prevented, there would be 593.5 serious adverse events.

The researchers concluded that “booster mandates in young adults are expected to cause a net harm.”

Whichever side of this debate you sit on, this data is scandalous. And mainstream media should be all over this story. Which of course begs the question, why aren’t they?

https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2022/12/05/jme-2022-108449